More Reasons for LABRats
Forrest M. Mims III
The National Science Teachers Association
(NSTA) has issued yet another discouraging news release
on the status of science education in the United States.
The report provides more justification for the LABRats
program. LABRats was founded by Dr. Shawn Carlson,
Executive Director of the Society for Amateur Scientists
and a MacArthur Fellow (Fig. 1).
The NSTA report discusses shortfalls
in properly trained science educators. According to
the report, Nancy Grasmick, the state superintendent
of schools for Maryland, has written “We need to interest
students in math, science, and technology at a younger
age, spark their curiosity, and help them understand
how they can become part of a future that desperately
needs their skills.”
If this sounds familiar, then you have
probably read or heard similar statements by Shawn Carlson,
whose passion is nothing less than the renewal of an
appreciation for science by youth across the United
States and beyond.
The text of the NSTA news release is
at Giving
Our Students
the Math and Science Education They Deserve.
Here is the full text of the release:
"In the March 15 edition of Education
Week , Nancy Grasmick, the state superintendent of schools
for Maryland, states "America has dropped the ball on
science, mathematics, and technology education. Our
nation has ignored science and math education for far
too long, and a serious investment in technology training
at all levels is overdue. We need more physicists, mathematicians,
chemists, and other technically skilled people in the
pipeline, and we need to recruit more prospective teachers
in those disciplines. That process begins with a new
emphasis on mathematics and science in elementary and
secondary schools.”
"Grasmick brings attention to the disturbing
statistics in her own state where “only one student
in physical-science education graduated from a higher
education institution last year. Just 13 students in
chemistry education graduated from a Maryland college
or university, and 11 graduated in physics education.”
At the same time, she notes that Maryland schools needed
12 physical-science teachers, 59 chemistry teachers,
and 29 physics teachers. “We need to interest students
in math, science, and technology at a younger age, spark
their curiosity, and help them understand how they can
become part of a future that desperately needs their
skills.” Grasmick served on the committee to develop
the recent National Academies' report, Rising Above
the Gathering Storm. To read the commentary, visit:
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2006/03/15/27grasmick
.h25 .html (free registration required)." 
|