| The Mammoth Hunter: David Wasion's
Quest for Pre-Clovis People in North America
How Cut Marks on Ancient Mammoth Bones Pushed Back the Date of the Earliest Known Arrival of People in North America
David Wasion
David Wasion is an avocational archaeologist with
extensive experience in making high quality archaeological
illustrations and in surveying, mapping and supervising
field excavations. In 1992, Wasion independently discovered
obvious human butcher marks on ancient mammoth bones
stored in the basement of a museum. This historic find
pushed back the arrival of people in North America to
a thousand years or more before Clovis man and led to
the discovery and excavation of the remains of two mammoths
that were apparently butchered by pre-Clovis people.
Here is David Wasion's story about one of the most significant
archaeological finds in North America. Editor.
In 1992 and 1994 two discoveries were made that have
had a major impact on the scientific community. These
finds, the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths, were discovered
and excavated in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, through
the efforts and skills of a number of individuals. I
was one of them. My part in this drama was the key to
its beginning. Due to more than a little prompting by
my children, friends, colleagues, and a number of others
in the scientific community, I have decided to tell
the story of the events leading up to the discovery
of the Schaefer and Hebior mammoths in Kenosha County,
Wisconsin.
This narrative really begins for me
some twenty years before the actual discoveries were
made. I was born within twenty miles or so from the
area, and, after completing the sixth grade, moved with
my family to southern Illinois, where I grew up. As
a young man I returned to the area and settled in Kenosha.
I immediately became active in local archaeology. I
had just left southern Illinois, where I had been an
active member of the Central Wabash Archaeological Society.
There I got my first taste of doing archaeology on a
professional level under the tutelage of Mr. Denzil
Stephens. With him I enjoyed the excitement of excavating
an Early Middle Woodland Transitional site on the Embarros
River. I was "bit by the bug," as they say,
and had no intention of stopping just because I had
moved up north to the big city.
The Paleolithic Period has always been
the most exciting part of prehistory for me: the Ice
Age, monstrous glaciers, spruce tundra forests and mega-fauna.
A magical time long ago when everything was different,
it wove its intoxicating web around me and captured
my imagination. Many times as a youth, while hunting
arrowheads in the plowed fields of southern Illinois,
I would stop in the middle of a field, on a riverbank
or the edge of some bluff, look around, and try to imagine
what it might have been like in Paleolithic times. How
different the landscape, the weather and the animals
must have looked.
The animals held a special fascination
for me. They included North American lions, identical
to but larger than African lions, cave bears larger
than today's grizzly and Kodiak bears, giant ground
sloth, giant beaver, dire wolves larger than North American
timber wolves, horses, and camels. But of all those
extinct creatures, the one that held the most fascination
for me was the wooly mammoth. Other mammoth types were
exciting, as were mastodons, but for some reason the
wooly for me epitomized the last great Ice Age. And
the fact that the earliest human inhabitants on this
continent hunted and killed these giant six- to eight-ton
beasts was remarkable in and of itself.
I was fascinated by other prehistoric
time periods as well, especially the Middle Woodland
Period with its Adena and Hopewell cultures, their beautiful
mortuary artifacts and fascinating lifestyle. Every
time period that has ever been defined carries with
it something surprising or admirable. But as a rule,
for me, after the Pleistocene Period, the Earth took
a long hiatus right up to modern times.
I hadn't been back in the Kenosha area very long
when I began to hear stories of giant mammoth- or mastodon-type
bones that were discovered in Kenosha County many years
ago. As a young man, I got very excited about the prospect
of making such a discovery or rediscovering something
once found and long forgotten, but when I tried to find
out where the discoveries were made, or get any real
solid details, no one seemed to know anything. The best
information I could get was that many years earlier
some bones had been displayed in the Kenosha County
Courthouse. So I inquired at the Courthouse, the logical
place to start. No one working there could remember
anything about old animal bones. I hit one dead-end
after another until little by little I began to give
up hope.
Off and on over the next twenty years
someone would mention those early discoveries and I
would start to feel that old excitement. But then, as
before, no one had the slightest clue to point me in
the right direction. I concentrated on more accessible
archaeology in the eastern portion of Kenosha County,
from the Des Plaines River east to the Lake Michigan
shoreline and from the Illinois-Wisconsin line north
to Racine County. I occasionally worked out of the area,
but, believe me, there's a lifetime's worth
of research in that portion of Kenosha County alone.
In those early years there were no
other local archaeologists active in this area. Working
alone, I surveyed and reported a large number of sites
that would prove to be significant. This work allowed
me to establish good relations with a number of locals
and landowners. In the early 1970's I did some
hunting on a piece of property where locals had been
finding projectile points of various kinds. I recognized
it as a potential paleolithic site, and named it the
Chesrow Site, after the land owner, the Chesrow Corporation
out of Chicago. I reported it to the State of Wisconsin.
Dr. David Overstreet, of the Great Lakes Archaeological
Research Center (GLARC) in Milwaukee, sent Mike Gregg
to check it out. Gregg was impressed with the Chesrow
Site and recommended it for national recognition. Dr.
Overstreet later contacted me to tell me that it had
been accepted by the National Historic Register. After
that, I worked as opportunity permitted for GLARC, as
lithics illustrator, map maker, site surveyor, excavator,
site supervisor, and local expert consultant, among
other things.
Chesrow was one of the sites I worked
on with Dr. Overstreet. Mr. Dan Joyce, Curator of the
Kenosha Public Museum, who was an anthropologist experienced
in archaeology, also visited the site. After that meeting
I did a nominal amount of work for the Kenosha Public
Museum, including the solo excavation of the Pike Site,
which I discovered. I would periodically go and visit
Mr. Joyce at the Museum and he was always cordial and
friendly, more than willing to share information and
show me things stored in the museum's collection.
He was fairly new in the area and always seemed anxious
to take time to talk.
I did a considerable amount of work on my own, simply
because I had a passion for archaeology, but also because,
as before, no one else was very active in this area.
In the middle of all my work I always kept my eyes open
for evidence of those giant bones that I knew had been
discovered years earlier. In ravines, along riverbanks,
anywhere that I thought I might stumble across a bone
or a portion of a large bone, that's where I looked.
But having nothing substantial to go on, my search was
in vain until one afternoon in 1992, when, as fate would
have it, I was talking to a friend and the conversation
came around to those old bones again. My friend said
that the bones might have been written about in the
Kenosha News when they were first discovered.
Could this be true? I was apprehensive, but at the same
time I believed after all those years I was staring
my first real break right in the face.
The next day I went to the Kenosha
Public Museum to talk with Mr. Joyce. I still didn't
know him very well, but he seemed like an all right
guy. So during our conversation I brought up the subject
of those old bones again and told him what I had heard.
I said that I intended to go over to the Kenosha County
Historical Society, where the old newspapers were kept
on microfilm, and see if I could find the stories that
were printed when they were discovered. If I could find
the old articles, I might find more information about
the farms where they were originally found. That would
open the possibility of discovering the rest of the
animals' remains and possibly lead to an excavation.
Mr. Joyce thought it was a good idea. He told me the
Historical Society was in the process of changing hands
and it might be a good time to go over and get acquainted
with the new staff.
Then out of nowhere he surprised me
with something he had never mentioned before. The museum
had a map hand-drawn by Phil Sanders, a citizen scientist
and former director of the Kenosha County Historical
Society, who had visited the Schaefer Farm when the
bones were found there in 1964. Mr. Joyce also talked
about the Fenske site and the Mud Lake site, where other
bones had been found. This was getting better by the
minute. We had names, dates, approximate dates, and
the strong possibility of a map. I asked him about the
bones themselves. But like everyone else he didn't
have a clue what had happened to them after they were
removed from display at the Courthouse. Even if we had
the name of a farm, in all likelihood it would have
changed hands over the years, even if only from father
to son. Memories wane, information is lost forever,
people have passed away, and new or current owners haven't
a clue. I needed substantial information. It seemed
clear to me that no one else was going to do anything
about it. I was on my own. I had to find those old articles.
I drove over to the Kenosha County
Historical Society that same afternoon. At that time
the Historical Society was located on the south side
of town in a large, beautiful old house that had once
been a private home. A well dressed, elderly lady who
was coming down the main staircase met me in the large
foyer. I explained to her why I was there, and she directed
me to their archives. I was met there by a younger woman
who told me she was part of the new staff.
I explained once more why I was there
and asked if she could show me where to look at old
newspaper articles. She showed me where to go, and I
sat down and began the slow process of viewing article
after article after article. I seem to recall going
back several times, but all I remember for sure is that
I spent a great deal of time poring over that microfilm
and finding absolutely nothing. I was getting more than
a little frustrated. Mr. Joyce had mentioned a couple
of dates, and I'd exhausted those time periods
plus every other possibility I could think of.
I sat there going over and over the
old clippings. I noticed the young woman watching me
from behind her desk. After some time she said, “Excuse
me.” I stopped and looked at her. She said she
had just realized that in the early days of Kenosha
there were two newspapers. The Kenosha News,
the one I had been looking at, was the regular paper.
Perhaps the other paper would have carried the articles
I was looking for. That would explain why I couldn't
find the articles. I couldn't believe it, another
newspaper! I was looking in the wrong newspaper. Frustration
turned to hope.
I asked her to show me where those
microfilms were stored, which she gladly did. Hope turned
to reward. I wasn't scanning this other paper
more than ten minutes when I stumbled onto the first
article, a 1926 writeup about the Fenske bone discovery.
After a very short hunt, I found the other articles.
Within minutes, after all those years of searching,
questioning, and frustration, the Kenosha County mystery
bones became a reality. I was elated.
After having copies made of the articles,
I was walking out of the room when the young woman stopped
me. She said they had been doing an inventory and, while
cataloguing things in the basement, had found a wooden
box full of some very large, old bones. She offered
to take me to the basement to see the bones if I was
interested.
I quickly agreed. The basement lights weren't
very bright, but I could see well enough. Things were
strewn about here and there all over the floor. It was
obvious a major inventory was in progress. Things that
hadn't been seen for many years were being pulled
out, examined, and catalogued. “It's over
here”, she said, walking over to a large wooden
box that had been pulled out and separated from the
rest of the collection. The lid was loose. I bent down
and started removing it. As soon as I could make out
the contents with the lid only half off, my hands started
shaking. Inside the box were very large bones darkened
with age. They had the black-brown color that results
only from lying in the muck and clay at the bottom of
a swamp for thousands of years. We moved the box under
a light. As I knelt down for a closer look I felt my
heart begin to race.
There on a large femur were a number
of very obvious manmade cut marks. They were not microscopic
hopefuls. They were cut marks made with such force as
to make them easily discernable to the touch and to
the naked eye. There were other bones with obvious cut
marks on them. By this time my heart was practically
pounding out of my chest. The weight of what I was looking
at hit me hard. I turned to the woman and asked her
questions like, "Do you see these marks?"
"Do you know what they are?" "Do you
understand the significance of this?" "Do
you realize scientists have been looking for this for
over a hundred years?”
I remember her standing there, and
her expression gave me the impression that my obvious
excitement didn't seem to be spilling over onto
her. After a while she told me I could stay and examine
the bones as long as I liked, but she had to get back
to work. As she disappeared up the stairs, I knelt down
again, alone with my treasure, and touched the cut marks
on the femur. I wondered how many wonderful and important
discoveries had been made by someone all alone in a
jungle or slaving away in a lab when suddenly something
occurred that was more exciting than they could have
ever imagined, and there they were with no one else
to share in the celebration. Now here I was in the same
situation. But not for long.
I found a phone as fast as I could and called my friend
Dr. Overstreet. I told him about what I had found and
told him he'd better get down here right away.
I'm sure he could sense the urgency and excitement
in my voice. He said he was tied up for the rest of
the afternoon, but he could come down the following
day. He asked if I had contacted Mr. Joyce at the Kenosha
Public Museum. I said I hadn't. To be truthful
I was reluctant to trust someone I didn't know
very well with what was obviously an important discovery.
Dr. Overstreet, on the other hand, I had known and worked
with for many years. His integrity and trustworthiness
were impeccable. My intentions were to tell him alone
and trust his judgment on how to proceed. But, because
of his integrity, he told me Mr. Joyce was the “local
guy,” meaning that he was the local professional
experienced in archaeology, and it would only be right
to include him in the meeting. I agreed and called Mr.
Joyce at the museum. After explaining what I had found
to him, he agreed to meet with us the following day
at the Historical Society.
The three of us met in the basement
of the Historical Society. I excitedly showed them my
discovery. I could see them both get excited, too, when
I showed them the cut marks, but being professionals,
they controlled their excitement very well. Right away
they started talking about carbon dating and sending
the bones to a cut mark specialist. At one point Dr.
Overstreet turned to Mr. Joyce and said that he wanted
it understood and agreed to from the outset that I would
be intimately involved in whatever comes of the discovery
from beginning to end, no matter what it might turn
into or however long it might take. For a long moment
Dr. Overstreet looked at Mr. Joyce until he nodded his
head and agreed. I was a little surprised by this, but
you have to understand that's the kind of person
Dr. Overstreet is and was. He respects my work, despite
the fact that I don't have a degree in archaeology.
Later in the meeting Mr. Joyce said he had found the
Phil Sanders map, and that it showed the exact location
of the original bone discovery on the Schaefer farm
in Paris Township in Kenosha County. Fate had set some
very large wheels in motion, and I was right in the
middle of it.
We learned that the Schaefer farm had remained in the
family and belonged to Mr. Frank Schaefer, who was more
than willing to let us check it out. Later that spring
of 1992, Mr. Joyce, his wife Ruth Blazina-Joyce, and
I located the Schaefer mammoth with the help of Phil
Sanders' map. We were excited to find that the
bones had cut marks on them. In the spring of 1994,
Dr. Dave Overstreet, Frank Schaefer, and I discovered
the Hebior Mammoth on the adjacent Hebior farm with
the willing invitation of Mr. John Hebior and his family.
One Sunday afternoon Frank Schaefer and I located the
bone pile of the Hebior mammoth.
The exact spot where we dug was decided
on by Dr. Overstreet during a phone conversation I had
with him. The decision to look in that exact spot came
after an intense effort made under grueling conditions
by a dedicated field crew consisting of a group of graduate
students from Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
volunteer Mark "Jake" Bolton, Principal Investigator
Dr. Dave Overstreeet (also Principal Investigator of
the 1992 Schaefer excavation), and Dr. Overstreet's
two sons, Colin and Ryan Overstreet. I was Site Supervisor
and Site Illustrator.
Dr. David Overstreet provided the
photographs for this article. He affirms David Wasion's
discovery and writes that, "... scientific confirmation
of Dave's initial observations was accomplished by the
hard work of Dr. Eileen Johnson, the Museum at Texas
Tech University. Dr. Johnson carried out a formal taxonomic
analysis of the Hebior, Schaefer, Mud Lake, and Fenske
fossils under the auspices of a grant I received at
Marquette University from the National Science Foundation."
For more about David Wasion, see the Editorial and his
impressive resume,both of which are elsewhere in this
issue of The Citizen Scientist. Forrest M.
Mims III, Editor. 
|