Printer-friendly version

29 August 2003

Limits at Infinity

by George E. Hrabovsky, President, MAST

A Continuation

Last week we completes our arithmetic of infinity.  Today, we explore the question of what happens when an independent variable approaches infinity.

Limits at Infinity

So far we have been considering limits of definable quantities.  It seems natural to eventually ask the question, "What happens to a function as our independent variable approaches infinity?"

We begin by assuming that we have an infinite interval, (a, +∞).  If, given any ϵ>0, there exists some arbitrarily large number (classically denoted as M), M = M(ϵ) >0, such that | f(x) - L | < ϵ for all x > M, then we can then say that f(x) approaches L as x approaches +∞.  This can be written f(x)  L as x  +∞, or,

Underscript[lim, x +∞] f(x) = L .

This is the definition of a limit at infinity.

Two Theorems

I will now present two theorems that are relevant.  This first theorem establishes the fact that any problem involving limits at infinity can be reduced to a problem of limits at zero.

Theorem 1

The function f(x) L as x +∞ if and only if there exists another function f^*(ξ) = f(1/ξ) L as ξ0 from the right.  We also have f(x) L as x -∞ if and only if there exists another function f^*(ξ) = f(1/ξ) L as ξ0 from the left.

The second theorem establishes the behavior of sums of limits at infinity.

Theorem 2

If the functions f(x) L and g(x) L ' as x +∞ then f(x) ± g(x)  L ± L '.

Asymptotes

I now introduce three definitions that are very important.

If either of these conditions is true,

Underscript[lim, xx_0 +] f(x) = ∞, Underscript[lim, xx_0 -] f(x) = ∞,

then the line described by x = x_0 is called a vertical asymptote of f(x).  If, on the other hand, one of these conditions is true,

Underscript[lim, x +∞] f(x) = y_0, Underscript[lim, x -∞] f(x) = y_0,

then the line described by y = y_0 is called a horizontal asymptote of f(x).  If the distance between a point  = (x, f(x)) and a straight line whose angle of inclination is neither 0° nor 90°such that the distance approaches zero as x  ± ∞, then the straight line is called an inclined asymptote of f(x).

The Math Challenge from Last Time

The task was to prove the two theorems about addition of infinity.  The first was the formula,

∞ + L = ∞ .

If we think about, and you really have to squeeze your head hard to squirt this one out, you will realize that we can write the sum of two functions as such,

FormBox[RowBox[{f(x) + g(x),  , =,  , RowBox[{f(x)[1 + g(x)/f(x)], RowBox[{Cell[], .}]}]}], TraditionalForm]

By Corollary 3 from, "Properties of Extreme Limits," we know that g(x)/f(x) 0 as xx_0.  As a result we have

FormBox[RowBox[{1 + g(x)/f(x), , 1.}], TraditionalForm]

Then, by Corollary 1 form , "Properties of Extreme Limits," f(x) + g(x) ∞ as xx_0.
    The second theorem was,

∞ + ∞ = ∞ .

Let's assume that there is some sufficiently large number, M>0, and we have some δ_1 such that | f(x) | >M for 0< | x - x_0 | <δ_1.  Now, if we have a deleted neighborhood described by 0< | x - x_0 | <δ_2 where f(x) and g(x) have the same sign.  Now we have 0< | x - x_0 | <min {δ_1, δ_2} implies that | f(x) + g(x) | > | f(x) | >M.  Since M is arbitrarily large we see that this implies that f(x) + g(x) ∞.

The Math Challenge

Can you prove the theorems of this column?

Math Resources for Limits

Online:

http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma2001/notes/node37.html

This is a rather uninspired page, but it is the best one that I could find.

Books:

Richard A. Silverman, 1969, Modern Calculus and Analytic Geometry, MacMillan Company, New York (Dover Publications has reprinted this book with corrections in 2002). This has a very nice chapter on limits that includes a very detailed discussion of limits at infinity.


Created by Mathematica  (August 28, 2003)