19 July 2002
Tensor Than Before
by George E. Hrabovsky, President, MAST
News from MAST
Hello from MAST! Just to let you know, we are expecting to have a shareware periodic table that does lots of neat stuff finished by the end of this month (that means it will be done in the next three months :-) ).
Last week I rather cavalierly mentioned
that something was called the stress tensor, unfortunately I didn't really
explain what the word tensor means. I will try to explain about tensors in this
column.
So far we have discussed scalars
and vectors. Recall that a scalar is simply a magnitude, and a vector is a sequence
of magnitudes that conform to certain properties. In fact any sequence that
conforms to these rules is a vector.
One can generalize this by stating
that a vector is a sum of the products of the components of the vector with
the unit vector corresponding to the component. If we are thinking of a vector
in Cartesian coordinates the unit vectors are
,
,
and
.
So the vector becomes,
![]()
It is reasonable to ask a question of some relevance for physical phenomena. Is there any phenomena that exhibits an additional level of dependency upon direction. That is, using Cartesian coordinates, is it possible that some property will have an x component that itself has an x, y, and z component. Take our example of the stress tensor,
![]()
At first glance it seems to be very
familiar. It looks a lot like the expression for a vector. The difference is
that we have a sum of a very special kind of product. Instead of the product
being a component scalar and a unit vector, we have a component vector and a
unit vector. What kind of product is this? It is not an inner product (or dot
product), nor is it an outer (cross) product.
It is a special product called a dyad. In general we can write a dyad as follows
![]()
We can also write the dyad as a symbol,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_7.gif]](Images/index_gr_7.gif)
This is called the nonian
form of the dyad.
A sum of dyads is called a dyadic. This is what our stress tensor is,
![]()
Where the first dyad is the product of the stress vector in the x direction in product with the unit vector in the same direction
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_9.gif]](Images/index_gr_9.gif)
If we make this more independent of a specific coordinate system, we can speak of the first direction, second direction, and so on. The first dyad would then have the form,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_10.gif]](Images/index_gr_10.gif)
If we stare at this long enough we can realize that there is a shorter way of writing this,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_11.gif]](Images/index_gr_11.gif)
We can generalize this by writing,
![]()
We can put this together for our Stress Tensor,
![]()
I think this is enough for this week.
Theory Challenge Answer for Last Week's Column
A tensor represents a higher-order of dependency on components than a vector. For a three-dimensional space a vector will have three terms. A tensor is an object that shows the dependency on the coordinates; a scalar has no such dependency and is thus a tensor of order 0. A vector has a dependency in every direction and is thus a tensor of rank 1. A second order tensor would then have a component in each direction for each direction (a three dimensional order two tensor would have nine components) and so on.
Theory Challenge
Use the dyad and dyadic ideas to construct rules of addition for dyadics.
Every time you answer the Theory Challenge for this column your name will be entered into a database. Every six months a drawing will be made and the winner will receive a prize. The current prize is your choice of either Riley, Hobson, Bence, Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering or your choice of any three Schaum's Outline Books. If you respond to four challenges you get four chances to win. If you respond to no challenges, well, you're out of luck! The drawing will take place on 6 September, and the winner will be announced in the next Bulletin after the 6th of September.
Books That I Like
I recommend two books, one is, unfortunately, out of print.
E. A. Fox (1967), Mechanics, Harper and Row. This is a very nice book that introduces the concepts of Continuum Mechanics in a very nice way.
The other is,
Robert C. Wrede, (1963), Introduction to Vector and Tensor Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc. in 1972). This is my favorite book about vectors and tensors (from an introductory standpoint).