21 December 2001
What Kinds of Pushes are
There?
by George E. Hrabovsky, President
of MAST
News from MAST
Hello again. Welcome. From
all of us at MAST let me wish all of you a very happy holiday season.
This column will be about
the different kinds of forces that exist.
What Forces are There?
Last week we established
that you can derive formulas for forces based solely on the variables
we use use to express them. We also established that by examining such
variables we can determine if a formula is correct, since all terms
of a formula must have the same units. Perhaps I should clarify what
I mean by a term. It is another of those words that we use without really
thinking about. A term represents one part of an expression separated
by addition or subtraction. The following expression has two terms.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_1.gif]](Images/index_gr_1.gif)
Another way of writing this
is,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_2.gif]](Images/index_gr_2.gif)
This formula has three terms,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_3.gif]](Images/index_gr_3.gif)
This one has four terms,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_4.gif]](Images/index_gr_4.gif)
So, we have now talked about
mass and force in general. It is time to get specific. Given Newton's
second law of motion,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_5.gif]](Images/index_gr_5.gif)
what forces exist to replace
the
?
There are two ways to look
at this question. We could ask it and then make an encyclopedia of the
different expressions for the forces that exist. This is a very useful
thing to do, but it takes a long time and lots of space. The second
way is to think about what sorts of forces are possible. How can we
do this? We look at Newton's second law and realize that the
part of it tells us that force always depends to one degree or another
on the mass and acceleration of an object. So, in out first approximation
we can say that force is a function of mass and acceleration,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_8.gif]](Images/index_gr_8.gif)
A good start, but we must
look more closely. Acceleration itself is a function of velocity and
time (it is the time derivative of velocity). Recall from earlier columns
("Pushing
the Pedal", and "Free
for Fall") how acceleration and velocity are related. So, we
now realize that force is actually a function of mass, time, velocity,
and acceleration.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_9.gif]](Images/index_gr_9.gif)
Now we think about velocity
and realize that it is a function of position and time (see the column,
"How
Fast?"). This leads us to realize that force is actually a
function of mass, time, position, velocity, and acceleration.
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_10.gif]](Images/index_gr_10.gif)
That's it! This covers all
of the forces that we can imagine in mechanics alone. There are other
forces due to charge and properties that only come into play within
the nucleus of an atom; and we will eventually talk about these, but
those forces way beyond our capabilities at the moment. Indeed there
are only three forces that our formula above does not cover, this formula
establishes every other force imaginable! I think that is enough of
a revelation for this week.
Theory Challenge Answer
for Last Week's Column
Given an area
of a surface over which a layer of fluid is flowing with velocity
,
we will see layers of fluid flowing at different velocities from
that we will call
and that these layers will be separated by a distance
.
A force will be generated parallel to the surface but opposing the direction
of flow, called friction. It turns out that a formula for this
force is given by
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_16.gif]](Images/index_gr_16.gif)
where
is the coefficient of viscosity and is normally given in units of poises
(1 poise = 1 gram per centimeter per second). Converting this into dimensions
we have,
![[Graphics:Images/index_gr_18.gif]](Images/index_gr_18.gif)
>From this we can see that
the formula is dimensionally correct.
Theory Challenge
Determine what your example
force is a function of (what are its independent variables). Do not
include constants!
Books That I Like
This is actually a fairly
simple idea and it escapes me as to why it only really appears in advanced
undergraduate texts on mechanics. Two such books follow (and, incidentally,
I know all three authors reasonably well).
Keith R. Symon (1971), Mechanics,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. One of the best undergraduate-level
tests, though it doesn't discuss chaos, it covers just about everything
else you could want, it has lots of practice problems (with the answers
to odd-numbered problems), and pretty lucid discussions of the concepts.
Vernon Barger, Martin Olsson
(1995), Classical Mechanics: A Modern Perspective, McGraw-Hill.
I like the order of topics in this book. It uses Lagrange's equations
of motion beginning in the third chapter and focuses on the conservation
laws. It has chapters on gravitation, Newtonian cosmology, special relativity,
and even an introduction to chaos. One word of caution, do not think
of this rather short book as being casual, many of the derivations are
sketchy with many details left to the reader to sort out. 
Converted by Mathematica
December 19, 2001