07 December 2001
What a Diet Can't Fix
by George E. Hrabovsky, President
of MAST
News from MAST
Hello
again. I know that I claimed that we would have some results from a
crystallography experiment done last night. I am sorry to announce that
the experiment did not take place. We have been unable, thus far, to
acquire the necessary parts for a hot stage microscope. We are working
on this and will report our results when we get them.
So far we have considered
motion without thinking about what causes it. This week we will begin
a study of what causes motion to occur, or change.
Mass and the Acceleration
Due to Gravity
Galileo Galilei was one
of the greatest physicists ever, the list of his accomplishments is
truly remarkable. In his day there was an interesting idea that make
perfect sense. Recall that at that time it was believed that the Earth
was the center of the universe. The idea was that the center of the
Earth drew all things to it, and that all things had their place. This
attraction is called gravitation and was seen as a pervasive
throughout the universe. Another idea was that the heavier an object
is the faster it falls. Again, this makes perfect sense.
Once you think about the
idea carefully a contradiction occurs. Galileo recognized this and exposed
the fallacy for all to see. If a heavier object falls faster than a
lighter object, and a lighter object is tied to a heavy one the heavy
object should then slow down due to the action of the lighter object.
On the other hand, the lighter object tied to the heavier object that
creates a compound object that is heavier still than the heavy object,
so it must fall faster. Whenever an idea generates two conclusions that
are contradictory, that idea is incorrect.
The only correct conclusion
is that all objects fall equally fast. Based on the last few columns
we can put this into more modern language, the acceleration due to
gravity is a constant.
But what causes the acceleration
due to gravity? What causes an object to fall as soon as we let go of
it? The answer to that is a remarkable story that brought us into the
modern age of science.
It turns out that the planet
Earth itself generates a pull on every other object in the entire
universe! This pull is stronger on some objects than others. It
is this pull that creates weight. It is this pull that causes an object
to fall. Such a pull is called a force and there are many kinds
of forces. The force that causes an object to fall is the force due
to gravity.
From this we can make the
following inference, a force applied to an object causes an acceleration
in that object. If we think about this for a while we come to the
realization that the force of gravity is what causes the acceleration
due to gravity. How does it do that? This is a deep mystery that was
only solved by Albert Einstein in 1915. The precise details of this
are still a mystery today.
The Earth somehow exerts
a force on other objects. In essence the Earth grabs hold of these other
objects in some way. But what does the Earth grab hold of with the force
of gravity?
The answer is that the force
of gravity grabs onto the material body of the object. The more material
the body has the greater the force that pulls on it. What is this measure
of the material in the body? We call this mass. Mass can be thought
of (at least for now) as the amount of stuff in the object. The more
stuff, the greater the mass.
Like distance and time we
need to develop a unit of mass, with which we can compare all other
masses. We will use the kilogram as our mass. We now have three
measurement scales that form the basis for a system of measurement called
the SI system (System International); meters for length, kilograms for
mass, and seconds for time (this is also called the mks system).
If we measure the relationships
between force, mass, and acceleration in repeated experiments we find
the following fact: The quantity of force acting on an object is
equal to the product of the object's mass and its acceleration.
We can write this using
as the symbol representing the quantity of force and
as the mass of the object,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_3.gif]](art/index_gr_3.gif)
This is called Newton's
Equation of Motion and we will go into great lengths to describe
what it means and what it does. For now this will be enough.
Theory Challenge Answer
for Last Week's Column
We begin where we ended
last week. We derived the expression,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_4.gif]](art/index_gr_4.gif)
If we rewrite
as
then we get,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_7.gif]](art/index_gr_7.gif)
If we separate variables
again we get,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_8.gif]](art/index_gr_8.gif)
We can now integrate both
sides, including the limits of integration for
from
to
,
and for
from 0 to
,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_14.gif]](art/index_gr_14.gif)
Integrating the left-hand
side of the equation we have,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_15.gif]](art/index_gr_15.gif)
where the right-hand side
is,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_16.gif]](art/index_gr_16.gif)
We now have to find a functions
whose derivative is
.
If we look in a table of derivatives we will eventually notice a rule,
called the power rule that states,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_18.gif]](art/index_gr_18.gif)
If we apply this in reverse
we see that, for
,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_20.gif]](art/index_gr_20.gif)
For our specific case we
need to make the coefficient of 2 vanish, so we introduce a constant
of
,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_22.gif]](art/index_gr_22.gif)
Putting both halves of the
equation back together, we get.
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_23.gif]](art/index_gr_23.gif)
or,
![[Graphics:art/index_gr_24.gif]](art/index_gr_24.gif)
in the downward direction.
If this were in the positive direction then the sign of
would be reversed. 