Martin Maner. The Research
Process. A Complete Guide and Reference for Writers. Second Edition,
(Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publications), 2000. 386 pages, includes
CD-ROM. $29.85. ISBN
0-7674-1139-0.
One
of the stated goals of the Society for Amateur Scientists is to help
amateurs take the results of their work and prepare it for submission
to professional, refereed journals. Although few amateurs have thus
far sought such help, perhaps the volume reviewed here will help some
of you get started. The presentation of research results is one of
the most important aspects of the scientific process. Even if you
never plan to submit your work to the likes of Nature or Physical
Review Letters, the process of writing about your work has the
effect of forcing you to take a hard look at your work versus what
is already in print.
This brings us to the process
of writing. Although it is often enjoyable, it can also be a chore.
For me, getting started is the toughest part. This usually involves
sitting down in front of the keyboard and cursing quietly for a few
minutes. Next, I stare at a blank computer screen until my forehead
bleeds. After that, I'm fine.
Of course, writinggood
writingis more than just shoveling words into a document. It
involves planning, defining the subject, researching what is already
out there, organization, and once you actually begin to write, you
must follow certain conventions both to avoid confusing the reader
and to reassure others that you know how to write.
Despite the title, Martin
Maner's The Research Process is not so much about research
per se as it is about research in the service of writing. It
describes itself as a "complete guide and reference for writers."
It comes very close to satisfying this claim by combining the features
of a grammar and style guide, logic primer, research and study guide.
Although it is clearly aimed at college students in undergraduate
writing courses, it is an excellent guide and sourcebook for amateur
scientists, especially those who have not done serious writing for
awhile.
The first two main chapters
("The Nature of Research Writing" and "Finding and Narrowing the Topic")
explain the problems a research paper seeks to address, and how to
select and narrow the topic. If you don't write often, this process
can be suprisingly difficult. If you already have a topic, this chapter
is still useful, as it walks you through the process of refining the
topic in terms of the arguments and evidence you need to back your
thesis. The third chapter, "Generating an Argument", consists of a
short but very useful treatise on logic and argumentation and the
fallacies one should avoid. Another section of this chapter is called
"Can I Really Challenge the Experts?" This will appeal to amateurs
for obvious reasons. Maner believes that one can challenge and question
conventional wisdom as long as your arguments are good and you present
them in a way that does not make you look like just another crank.
Maner offers some good strategies and wisely insists on consultation
with experts as you develop your arguments.
The chapter that follows
("Finding Sources") covers the process of actually going out and finding
the information you need for the paper. If you are an amateur scientist
(and I assume you are), much of your information will probably be
experimental data. However, if you want to be thorough and make it
completely clear that you have done your homework, some outside research
will be necessary. This section has good hints on using the internet
as well as libraries. This is important because current search engines
give the mistaken impression that anyone can do professional-quality
research using only the net. In fact, although you can do some remarkable
things with a search engine, to get really stunning results you must
employ the same kind of thinking that reference librarians use to
work their magic. Maner is attempting the impossible in this chapter;
the subject of library or internet research cannot be adequately conveyed
in the space he allots. His chapter here is only a superficial introduction.
It will get you started but it won't take you to information Nirvana.
However, another book which I will review next week will more than
make up that shortfall.
"Writing a Short Plan"
and "Gathering Information" follow, which respectively follow the
process of writing a prospectus and turning your raw information into
usable data with hints on note-taking, active reading, and paraphrasing
as a method of learning. Maner explains how to intelligently digest
data and turn it into original research.
The next two chapters discuss
how to apply research formats, specifically MLA, APA, CBE, and Chicago.
These chapters address style considerations as well as footnote and
bibliography conventions. These chapters include examples of the most
common formatting questions, with additional examples in the final
chapter, "Mechanics." This information can save you the time and trouble
of finding (and using) the guides for the style formats listed. If
this book removes the necessity of purchasing a copy of the Chicago
Manual of Style (and it probably will), it will more than pay for
itself on that basis alone.
After all this, we come
to the chapters concerning the actual writing. The titles are "Writing
the Rough Draft," "Revising the Rough Draft" and "Editing." Here is
where Maner guides you through the process of taking your notes and
writing for brevity, clarity, and strength.
Like many textbooks these
days, this one includes a CD-ROM with extra goodies in a .pdf format.
Most of these are templates and examples of formats and students papers
the reader can use as models for their own work. Of particular interest
to the amateur scientist is the section on peer-review guidelines
for reviewing a colleague's work. The CD also has links to a web site
based on this book with additional links to additional research and
formating sites.
Maner's book attempts to
provide a "one stop shop" for those unfamiliar (or rusty) with writing
a research paper, a very difficult task. However, this book succeeds
admirably in giving the researcher a good collection of helps that
can save a great deal of time and frustration. It may not always be
the last place you need to look, but it should definitely be the first.